[dns-wg] RIPE-61 coming up
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE-61 coming up
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Postponement of DNSSEC KSK Roll-over for RIPE NCC Zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kostas Zorbadelos
kzorba at otenet.gr
Thu Sep 23 17:08:41 CEST 2010
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 12:34:40 Jim Reid wrote: > On 21 Sep 2010, at 07:26, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > > Where do we send proposals for agenta items? dns-wg-chair at ripe.net? > > Yes. > Thanks. > > I personally prefer to have a clash against the Address Policy and > > Cooperation > > or EIX and certainly not with the anti-abuse WG. > > OK. However it's already difficult to schedule WG slots in the meeting > plan. There's always going to be contention. The overall plan for > RIPE61 is pretty much fixed. If we try to move things around, that > creates ripple effects elsewhere. Which causes bigger scheduling > clashes. Which forces other meeting slots to move. Which creates even > more clashes. Which.... > Timetable Scheduling. NP hard, is it not? :-D > What Jaap was saying is our slots at RIPE61 are going to be scheduled > against the EIX and Anti-Abuse WGs. [There are essentially two meeting > plans and we alternate between them so the clashes between WG are not > always the same.] So if someone wanting an agenda slot has a > preference -- "I can present about foo but *have* to go to EIX" -- > your co-chairs will do their best to accommodate that. This does of > course get harder as the WG agenda fills up. > In case there is an alternate schedule that avoids the clash with Anti-Abuse, it would be preferable to me. > So get your proposals for agenda items in soon! :-) Regards, Kostas
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE-61 coming up
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Postponement of DNSSEC KSK Roll-over for RIPE NCC Zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]