[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tony Finch
dot at dotat.at
Thu Dec 2 15:34:10 CET 2010
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Tony Finch: > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> > >> Me too. I think that the approach which Chris is suggesting > >> sits more in LIR territory than with the RIRs. > > > > What about legacy allocations where the DNAME needs to be placed in a > > reverse zone maintained by RIPE? > > I don't think such a case actually exists. Could you be more > specific? Ah, now I look they seem to be ARIN's zones. (Our allocations include 128.232, 129.169, and 131.111.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]