[dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Dec 1 21:27:05 CET 2010

Jim Reid wrote:

> On 29 Nov 2010, at 21:31, Chris Thompson wrote:
> 
>> I don't know whether this is the most appropriate forum to raise
>> this issue --- but if RIRs can be persuaded to support the alternate
>> form of reverse zone delegation suggested here, perhaps other
>> authorities would do the same.
> 
> 
> It is. You could write this up as a policy proposal if the WG likes 
> your idea. So far, the silence has been deafening.
> 
> Perhaps you could expand on your original posting and see if that 
> provokes some discussion?

I'm quite illiterate when it comes to DNS :-) but I read the proposal
and the idea.

What I fail to seeat 1st glance is where the RIR and the PDP comes in?

Wilfried.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Replacing reverse zone delegations by DNAMEs

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]