[dns-wg] DNS lameness question
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS lameness question
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Turning off lameness checks for reverse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Mon Mar 23 09:53:14 CET 2009
On 19.03.09 22:10, Ondřej Surý wrote: > >> - would it cause big problem if I kept it as it is, even if dns.nextra.sk > >> > does not exist? (I hope no delegations will be removed because of this) > > > > Since nobody other replied and you did not comment on this question, may I > > safely assume thet it would cause no problems if I'll leave it here, except > > those lameness warnings? > > I am not aware of any RIPE policy which would remove those lame records > on basis of ugliness ;). if there's no ripe policy that would remove those delegations... Yes I want to solve the problem fast. But it will still take some time... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages." "That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNS lameness question
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Turning off lameness checks for reverse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]