This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Mar 10 10:00:18 CET 2009

	Hello, Anand.

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:36 +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
> We are aware that around 1% of the servers we have in our list did not
> resolve to addresses, which resulted in these false positives.

	Rather than false positives, doesn't that indicate a
	different kind of lameness -- of the delegation, rather
	than of the server?

	/Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]