[dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Mar 10 10:00:18 CET 2009
Hello, Anand. On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:36 +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > We are aware that around 1% of the servers we have in our list did not > resolve to addresses, which resulted in these false positives. Rather than false positives, doesn't that indicate a different kind of lameness -- of the delegation, rather than of the server? /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: DNS lameness notifications
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]