[dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
andrei at ripe.net
Thu Oct 30 08:52:58 CET 2008
Patrik Fältström wrote on 30-10-2008 07:34: [...]> Now, we had this bullet: > > K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process must not > require a change of keys. > > Then I thought about changing it to the following: > > K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process should > minimize issues related to potential changes in keys when the entities > changes. > > Now, I am a bit confused... :-) > > Jakob, Ed, others...do you have any suggestion on text? > I was under the impression that point K essentially said that implementation should not cast the current root zone management setup (with regards to the entities) in stone. If this is so, how about the following: K - Changes of the entities representing roles in the signing process must be possible and have minimum effect on the keys. > Patrik > Andrei
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]