This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Sat Oct 25 20:50:03 CEST 2008
On Oct 25, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > You're claiming that isc had both bad intensions and bad code. This is NOT what I am claiming. I stated: "[...] I personally believe [DLV] is non-scalable, non-standard, and imputes a highly questionable trust model into _every_ non-cached DNS lookup [...]." If you believe any of these are incorrect, then you do not understand how DLV works. This says nothing of ISC's (or Paul's) intentions (which I do not believe are bad) or ISC's code (of which I have no opinion since I haven't looked at it). Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]