[dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Randy Bush wrote:

>> DLV which I personally believe is non-scalable, non-standard, and
>> imputes a highly questionable trust model into _every_ non-cached DNS
>> lookup
>
> bingo.  as i said when it was proposed, dlv is just isc ego producing
> root envy.

Interesting conclusion. See, the way I understood it from Paul, is that
it was not *meant* to scale, as it was an interim solution until not
only the root, but large zones as .com got signed properly.

You're claiming that isc had both bad intensions and bad code. I think
I'll use Ocam's Razor here, and stick with Paul's explanation.

> as you likely know, the problem is opensrs, which is behind all the
> low-cost and open registrars.  and we don't want to change to less open
> ones.

I'll see about getting an update on that situation for you.

Paul