[dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Thu Oct 23 22:52:21 CEST 2008
Shane, On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Shane Kerr wrote: > David, > > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 09:14 -0700, David Conrad wrote: >>> This does not scale. >> True, however it does scale for TLDs. > I disagree, for my own (admittedly lazy) sysadmin standards. Apologies, I elided a bit much. I was saying the ITAR scales for TLDs. It can be argued that it most likely won't scale as a general (that is, more than TLDs) TAR since, if nothing else, I suspect caching server implementations probably aren't built to handle O(100000+) trust anchors. > If you use DLV, I've resolved (pun intended) to not comment on DLV. Regards, -drc
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]