[dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matt Larson
mlarson at verisign.com
Tue Oct 21 15:29:42 CEST 2008
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:44:34AM -0400, > Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> wrote > a message of 18 lines which said: > > > This is why I think energy on this is better spent replying to the > > NTIA than here. > > [...] > It will probably have a stronger effect than carefully crafting a > reply which will probably be ignored, as all input from outside the US > has been ignored in all forums since the take-over of the root. I would not underestimate the effect of a thoughtful reply to the NoI. Since VeriSign interacts with the US DoC surrounding root zone maintenance, I know the staff there. They are clueful and I believe they want to do the right thing. I also believe that the NoI is a genuine request for information and not some kind of bureaucratic formality. Matt
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Another DNSSEC action: add your DS to DLV (Was: NTIA NoI: does anyone care?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]