This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Nov 6 14:35:23 CET 2008

On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:06, Florian Weimer wrote:

> In both cases, I don't quite see
> what the statement is supposed to mean.  Does it advise against the
> introduction of yet another layer of indirection, by requiring that
> the organization which makes the final, technical content decision on
> the root zone (the "generator") also creates the digital signatures?

It means whoever churns out the zone file for the root should also  
generate the RRSIGs for the signed version => having access to the ZSK.

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]