This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Wed Nov 5 17:37:35 CET 2008

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:11:33AM +0000,
 Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote 
 a message of 44 lines which said:

> Please contribute text. 

OK. I suggest to replace:

"RIPE welcomes the NTIA's consultation on the proposals to sign the
root and is pleased to support that effort. We urge the NTIA to adopt
a solution that leads to a prompt signed root zone. The solution must
not compromise the stability and integrity of the root zone management
process."

by:

"RIPE wants the root zone to be signed, in order to enable an easier
deployment of DNSSEC."

and then go on with your text.

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]