[dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Wed Nov 5 17:37:35 CET 2008
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:11:33AM +0000, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote a message of 44 lines which said: > Please contribute text. OK. I suggest to replace: "RIPE welcomes the NTIA's consultation on the proposals to sign the root and is pleased to support that effort. We urge the NTIA to adopt a solution that leads to a prompt signed root zone. The solution must not compromise the stability and integrity of the root zone management process." by: "RIPE wants the root zone to be signed, in order to enable an easier deployment of DNSSEC." and then go on with your text.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]