[dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Nov 3 20:28:45 CET 2008
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Patrik FC$ltstrC6m wrote: > > On 3 nov 2008, at 18.05, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > > I think a more pragmatic reply (if the previous points are to > > be respected) would be something along these lines: > > > >10. The organization that generates the root zone file must sign the > >file and therefore must hold the private part of the zone signing key. > > > >or > > > >10. The organization that generates the root zone file must have > >unfettered > >access to the zone signing key components. > > > > > > I have a slight inclination towards the second. > > I think the first of these is better as the word "unfettered" is not > easy to understand if one is not english speaking. I for one have no > idea what it means... > > The simpler the text, the better. > > Patrik Main Entry: fetB7ter Pronunciation: \Kfe-tIr\ Function: noun Etymology: Middle English feter, from Old English; akin to Old English fE t foot Date: before 12th century 1 : a chain or shackle for the feet 2 : something that confines : restraint that clarified, if you are happier with the first choice, i think it will make the response a better one than the current text. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] revised text for NTIA response - v4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]