[dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lutz Donnerhacke
lutz at iks-jena.de
Thu Jun 26 01:21:40 CEST 2008
* Edward Lewis wrote: > Given http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/dns/icann-root-signing.pdf and as > far as I know, no response back from ICANN to that, followed by the > exchange above perhaps the WG should ask about this situation. (But > ask whom?) After the DNSSEC session yesterday on the ICANN meeting in Paris, I had some lengthy discussions with several board members on this subject. My impression is, that ICANN is faced with serios concerns by the US Gov. I think the right way is to prepare a policy proposal for the Cairo meeting later this year. It might be worth thinking who should prepare the proposal. > If indeed the (ICANN) root server operators have misgiving about the > experiment, could someone operating a root server express the reasons? According the the talk today (slides are available on htp://par.icann.org), there are no technical or operational issues anymore.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]