[dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Mon May 14 18:45:04 CEST 2007
In the light of this: Jim Reid wrote: > So the questions for the WG should be IMO: > > * Is there value in having the NCC provide DNS service for big/important > reverse zones? > * If the answer to the above question is yes, under what conditions? ie > What do we mean by big or important? > * If the answer is still yes, should this service be compulsory or > optional? And under what conditions would optional use become compulsory > and vice versa? > * If the answer to the orginal question is no, what, if anything, does > the NCC do about things like lame delegations for reverse zones and the > operational problems these cause the NCC? I'd like to mention that slaving Tier 1 ENUM zones on ns.ripe.net is also purely optional only - for very good reasons. Some of them are hidden in Jim's questions. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]