[dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at hovland.cx
Sun Feb 18 22:36:20 CET 2007
----- Original Message ----- From: "Max Tulyev" <president at ukraine.su> > Lutz Donnerhacke wrote: > >>> I find those last two statements highly unlikely, but for argument sake, >>> multiply this by cost(crypto(lastmile))*count(users). >> >> I do not see the need for crypto on the last mile. > > And what to do with spoofed answers? 256bit nonce/id field instead of 16.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] What about the last mile, was: getting DNSSEC deployed
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]