[dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Apr 2 17:32:16 CEST 2007
On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Peter Koch wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:37:56PM +0100, Leo Vegoda wrote: > >> Do you know what percentage of rev-srv records are fully or partially >> accurate? > > I had hoped to be able to avoid this :-) [analysis snipped] I must admit that I've always thought of rev-srv as misinformation rather than useful information. I think you've demonstrated that it's difficult to use and doesn't reflect reality well. Seeing as a mechanism for auto-populating rev-srv fields with accurate information is likely to open up a new world of pain, deprecating it sounds like a good way of improving the accuracy of DNS data in the RIPE database. Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]