This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon Apr 2 17:32:16 CEST 2007
On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Peter Koch wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:37:56PM +0100, Leo Vegoda wrote: > >> Do you know what percentage of rev-srv records are fully or partially >> accurate? > > I had hoped to be able to avoid this :-) [analysis snipped] I must admit that I've always thought of rev-srv as misinformation rather than useful information. I think you've demonstrated that it's difficult to use and doesn't reflect reality well. Seeing as a mechanism for auto-populating rev-srv fields with accurate information is likely to open up a new world of pain, deprecating it sounds like a good way of improving the accuracy of DNS data in the RIPE database. Regards, -- Leo Vegoda IANA Numbers Liaison
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] use of "rev-srv" attribute in "inetnum" (and "inet6num") objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]