>>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Previous message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Thu Nov 2 12:14:15 CET 2006
Seems to be reasonable. Could you please advice us a right place (mail list?) to continue discussing political issues? I'm digging iana/icann sites and still can't figure it out... Peter Koch wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:50:10PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote: > >> Yeah, I see the big difference and using double-standards about two >> domains SU/EU are both not in ISO list :( >> >> But hope we can help to move it right way ;) > > ... provided "we" != dns-wg, I guess. As David Conrad suggested, the > policy issues are best dealt with through ICANN channels. What this > WG could address are the operational requirements and consequences: > > 1) Is there an operational reason to phase out a TLD? There is _NO_ operational reasons to phase out at least SU. It is operational now and is growing fast. Is somebody disagree with me? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
- Next message (by thread): >>: Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]