[dns-wg] "DNS Vulnerabilities" paper hits the mainstream
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] "DNS Vulnerabilities" paper hits the mainstream
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [dns-operations] "DNS Vulnerabilities" paper hits the mainstream
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
s.steffann at computel.nl
Sun Apr 30 21:17:01 CEST 2006
Hi, On Apr 30, 2006, at 19:25, Jim Reid wrote: > On Apr 30, 2006, at 19:25, Sander Steffann wrote: > [...] > >> People might get scared :) It is good that attention is given to the >> risks of badly secured DNS servers, but scaring the public like this... > > Indeed. Though personally speaking, I don't accept Sirer's methodolody > let alone his concluions about "vulnerabilities" or badly secured name > servers. Which doesn't for a moment mean the DNS has no vulnerablities or > badly secured servers. These do of course exist. Just not in the way Emil > Gun Sirer has suggested. I completely agree. I already mentioned it to some people at RIPE-52, but I forgot to mention it here. It's also on slashdot: [Perils of DNS at RIPE-52] http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/26/1247240 - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] "DNS Vulnerabilities" paper hits the mainstream
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [dns-operations] "DNS Vulnerabilities" paper hits the mainstream
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]