This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Francis Dupont Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr
Mon Oct 3 18:20:56 CEST 2005

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   So, my suggestion is to adjust the MNAME text in a way that keeps the
   original spirit but explicitly says that the name in MNAME 
   
   1) must resolve to an A RR(Set) 

=> A and/or AAAA

   2) the address (or, to complicate matters, addresses) must be the public
      address of the (hidden/stealth) primary master
   
=> I support Peter's proposal.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]