[dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

Mon Oct 3 18:20:56 CEST 2005

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   So, my suggestion is to adjust the MNAME text in a way that keeps the
   original spirit but explicitly says that the name in MNAME 

   1) must resolve to an A RR(Set) 

=> A and/or AAAA

   2) the address (or, to complicate matters, addresses) must be the public
      address of the (hidden/stealth) primary master

=> I support Peter's proposal.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont at enst-bretagne.fr