[dns-wg] Followup to IANA TLD delegation problem
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin jefsey at jefsey.com
Tue May 31 02:21:12 CEST 2005
Jim, what we might also want to know is the complete time table of the problem. And how the initial information came. As I maintain a daily report on the top zone, I am interested to know if this kind a problem can be watched for and how. thank you. jfc At 12:18 30/05/2005, Jim Reid wrote: > >>>>> "Olivier" == Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <Olivier.Guillard at nic.fr> writes: > > Olivier> It is not perfectly clear for me what kind of > Olivier> contribution you are waiting for to help moving forward, > Olivier> and the kind of actions you see as conceivable to be > Olivier> undertaken by the dns-wg ? > >My apologies for any confusion Olivier. My earlier mail was intended >to provoke a discussion on the list. This discussion would hopefully >allow the WG to reach consensus on: (a) if there were outstanding >issues along the lines of the questions I posed; and (b) what the WG >felt the next steps to resolve those issues could be. The response so >far seems to be that further clarification is required but it's not >critical. So if that's the consensus of the WG, the promised response >from Doug could well be enough to close this issue. > >It's really up to the WG to decide what happens. If nobody cares, we >just let things drop. If it's felt to be *really* important, then the >WG could make another formal communication to ICANN/IANA. If the >consensus is somewhere in between these two extremes, it may well be >enough to wait for Doug's reply to my questions. As WG chair, I'd just >like to find out what the WG's position is.
[ dns-wg Archives ]