[dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jun 7 17:55:30 CEST 2005
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:50:39AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > At 15:47 +0000 6/7/05, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > > just for grins... how would DNSSEC "bend" around this > > supporting girder (or crutch if you prefer). > > Having to know not to give up when seeing an unsigned answer coming > from a cache, treating this as a referral message and not a bogus so... get back the unsigned rrset (glue) - then treat as a referal & attempt to validate down its delegation chain...??? --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]