[dns-wg] [Fwd: [centr-fm] Re: IANA TLD delegation issue]
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Fwd: [centr-fm] Re: IANA TLD delegation issue]
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Fwd: [centr-fm] Re: IANA TLD delegation issue]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Mon Jun 6 16:23:04 CEST 2005
Olivier, can you please, if not done so earlier, please send this for publication as an I-D. Patrik On Jun 6, 2005, at 15:39, Kim Davies wrote: > Dear all, > > Olivier Guillard of AFNIC has described in the attached document > the details of their attempts to redelegate their domains. It is a > useful summary of the issue as they experienced it. > > kim > -- > Kim Davies, Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries > Avenue Louise 327, B-1050 Brussels; Tel. +32 2 627 5550 > > From: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <Olivier.Guillard at nic.fr> > Date: June 6, 2005 14:53:21 GMT+02:00 > To: Marcel Schneider <schneide at switch.ch> > Cc: fm at centr.org > Subject: [centr-fm] Re: [centr-ga] FWD: IANA TLD delegation issue > > > Marcel and colleagues, > > as the AFNIC multinamming story with IANA was quoted > within exchanges, we felt necessary to provide the > community with a report to clarify what happened. > > Find it here included. > > As there is no standard format to communicate over > the TLD community this kind of reports, I have > choosen the RFC one. It is not designed for this > kind of communications, but I felt that it was the > less unappropriate to use (-> it does exist and it > is known by ccTLDs). > > This is a raw draft: I would higly appreciate > *ANY* suggestions and inputs. > > This issue will be discussed over the next CENTR GA > in Trondheim: > http://www.centr.org/docs/2005/05/centr-ga26-agenda.pdf > > Best regards, > > > le vendredi 13 mai à 15 H 58 , Marcel Schneider a ecrit : > >> Since this is a real technical concern to us all. Propose >> we ask IANA to clarify. >> >> >> Marcel >> >> >> ------- Forwarded Message >> >> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 14:50:00 +0100 >> From: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> >> To: dns-wg at ripe.net >> Subject: [dns-wg] IANA TLD delegation issue >> >> Here is a copy of the mail that has just been sent to IANA in >> followup >> to the discussion during last week's RIPE meeting. My thanks to those >> who have helped draft this message so promptly. I will keep the WG >> informed of developments. >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> This note follows a discussion at the DNS Working Group during last >> week's RIPE meeting. Doug was unable to take part in this discussion >> because he was called away early. Therefore we have sent you this >> message so that we can clear up any possible misunderstandings and >> hopefully avoid invoking more formal mechanisms. >> >> The RIPE DNS Working Group is concerned about some aspects of the >> current practice regarding IANA TLD operations. In particular the >> problems encountered by AFNIC last month are unsettling. >> >> It is our understanding that IANA has recently stopped accepting >> certain updates to the DNS root zone. The current practice now >> appears >> to require each particular network address used in glue address >> RRs to >> have one unique DNS name. This requirement is new: multiple names >> already exist in the root zone for some name server addresses. There >> is no technical reason in the DNS protocols preventing this practice. >> >> Important technical and operational goals can require TLD >> operators to >> use different names for the same address. The most obvious of >> these is >> more efficient name compression to make room for additional data in >> responses. Multiple names for the same address can reduce the amount >> of co-ordination required in case of name server address changes. >> >> We do not understand why this requirement has been introduced or the >> process by which it was agreed. The RIPE DNS Working Group is >> disappointed that this change appears to have been carried out by >> IANA >> without prior consultation or discussion. We would like to know >> rationale for this policy and the mechanism which led to its >> introduction. We'd appreciate any clarifications from you before >> Friday, >> May 20th. >> >> Regards >> >> ..... >> chairs RIPE DNS WG >> >> >> ------- End of Forwarded Message >> > > -- > Olivier > > <draft-guillard-multi-naming.txt> > <draft-guillard-multi-naming.html> >
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Fwd: [centr-fm] Re: IANA TLD delegation issue]
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] [Fwd: [centr-fm] Re: IANA TLD delegation issue]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]