[dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [pim at bit.nl: Re: [dns-wg] DNS hardware]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Diaz
ddiaz at satec.es
Wed Aug 31 09:21:12 CEST 2005
Hi, Afaik, the RIPE NCC has polled the Community´s opinion about securing the reverse delegation tree in different ways and occassions and again afaik, there´s always been consensus on this to go forward. Olaf and other NCC colleagues have been working on this for years now (already when I still was at the NCC). After reading the policy, procedure and documents related, I agree with it and think this is a good staring point. As randy says, I see this more as an operational experience previous to full deployment but imho it´s also the closest the RIPE NCC (or any other RIR) can/could do at the moment. I also agree with Jim in taking .arpa as starting point. Imho, 'e164.arpa." could have been a better way to start and gain operational experience first (just for the size of it and the fact, as Jim points out, that it´s managed by the NCC). Still... I agree with the current RIPE NCC plans and procedures. Looking into the documents and procedures, it could be a good idea to produce a "clueless client" oriented document to make this more available to those willing to sign their zones etc... (my 2 cents). Regards. -- Daniel.Diaz DDL14-RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [pim at bit.nl: Re: [dns-wg] DNS hardware]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]