[dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcos Sanz/Denic
sanz at denic.de
Tue Aug 23 16:56:49 CEST 2005
Olaf, Jim, all, > Colleagues, you may recall Olaf posted a proposal to the list a few > weeks ago. It was about changes to the in-addr.arpa delegation > process to accommodate DNSSEC. In other words, updates to the > templates and database to allow for keying material, additional > checks at the NCC, etc, etc. To my eyes the proposal is good and I am happy somebody is taking the plunge. Congratulations. Two comments: http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/key-maintenance-procedure.html To a layman, the meaning of DLV can't be tracked down. A reference missing? http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/registry-procedure.html I suggest making the ds-rdata attribute an [inverse key] Best regards, Marcos
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]