[dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Sun Oct 24 14:11:09 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-10-22, at 13.26, Markus Grundmann/ORSN wrote: > >> You can't have it both ways. Either you have an independent >> root-zone, or >> it is ICANN based. If you have any technical concerns about the >> database management of the ICANN sanctioned servers, then you would >> have a >> point if the argument would be valid. It seems to me however you have >> political concerns with regards to database management (as in who >> manages > > Yes! ORSN has an political background but I think that is not bad. > Projects like ORSC (*ggrr*) undermines DNS. ! And not ORSN ! And your added value is? Besides increased risk of serving false data, and spreading FUD? - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQXucC6arNKXTPFCVEQJJ0QCgndWaOKDLQGxiFVQFT0QjLww2ItIAoKtz DdPYtohQdFFxFUwa26enTB5M =eKeD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: ORSN-SERVERS.NET
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]