This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Mon Oct 25 22:48:45 CEST 2004
At 9:39 PM +0100 2004-10-25, Jim Reid wrote: > Nope. Roy and Jakob's tool can already fingerprint Nominum's DNS > implementations. And just about anyone else's for that matter. I know about fpdns.pl. I was using it before it was officially released. Early discussions with Roy lead to the very gross fingerprinting methods I used in my DNS Comparison presentation that I gave at LISA 2002 and RIPE 44. None of that is to say that someone couldn't come along and make some modifications to the code that one of these programs runs, which would result in a different fingerprint being generated. If they then called this program by a totally different name, it might not be easy to tell that it's just a relatively minor modification to an existing program already in the database. > Besides, > I very much doubt if anyone would create a code fork and all the > aggravation flowing from that -- support overheads, regression > testing, documentation, software maintenance, etc -- just to confuse a > fingerprinting tool. It wouldn't necessarily take a big change in the code to result in a change to the fingerprint. If a customer is large enough and pays enough money, who's to say that even large changes wouldn't be made to the code, if the customer requested them? > And of course the tool could easily be updated to > take account of any obfuscation like that. Why would anyone choose to > enter that zero-sum game? Sure, but you have to know that there is obfuscation before you can try to compensate for it. So long as word never got out, people would not necessarily be likely to figure out what's going on. > You'll be much better off to trust this fingerprinting tool than > depend on my memory. :-) The tool is very robust and encodes a great deal of very useful information, but I think you do not give yourself enough credit. -- Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: Elimination of 2nd level ccTLD domain names
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]