[dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] dnsmon / .org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hans Petter Holen hpholen at tiscali.no
Fri Sep 12 18:00:56 CEST 2003

> On 10.09 12:18, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> > RIPE NCC should only monitor those ccTLDs that are LIRs or that their LIR
> > is willing to endorse.   -Hank
>
> I like the principle. However ....
>
> How would this endoresement be determined?

You offer the service only to members, so if a names server operator wants
this service they sign up as a member.

You probably should add a new billig category for this.

But that should be simple following the last AGM.

> Doing it simple-mindedly potentially leads to a *very* long list of
> domains to monitor, and not only (cc)TLDs.

Doing it this way the list will never be longer than your membership list.

-hph

• Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
• Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] dnsmon / .org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]