[dns-wg] RE: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Norris
mike.norris at heanet.ie
Wed Sep 10 12:47:42 CEST 2003
> I have had a number of questions like Joerg's already for all gTLDs > besides .MIL. I see little chance that we can get them all to agree to > pay a share of the cost. I also see that the overhead of making > agreements with some of the organisations involoved can be prohibitive. > If there is interest from the RIPE community it is easy to monitor these > domains. However it is very difficult to do it for some for free and > ask the others to pay. So doing that may lead to a situation where the > RIPE NCC membership ends up paying the whole bill. I would actually > like that because it makes the measurements even more independent > and I would not have to invest time into making agreements with the TLD admins, > billing, etc. pp. I agree; if people want accuracy and integrity, the measurements have to be taken independently. Mike Norris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3099 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/attachments/20030910/908024df/attachment.bin>
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: dnsmon / .org
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]