[dns-wg] v6 ns/glue naming bcp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Peter Koch wrote:

> Related to this, IPv6 already has an impact on server load. 
> On our system we already see large amounts of AAAA and A6 type queries 
> (each roughly 85% of the type A count), so I'd really favor a
> conservative approach.

We could make a rather stupid assumption that 85% of the queriers
you see request AAAA and then the A record. Thus that the installed
base supporting IPv6 is really growing. Sounds like a good thing.

Patrik Fältström [paf at cisco.com] wrote:

> (The pix blocks it in some configuration modes I can add before you all 
> say _T_H_E__P_I_X_...)

Haha, hmm people where indeed complaining about PIX's at RIPE46 :)
Btw, when is a PIX going to do IPv6, I once heared "March 2003"
but I queried a university where they wanted to do IPv6 but due
to policy stuff were not allowed as their PIX didn't filter IPv6
that it still did not support it :(

Greets,
 Jeroen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Unfix PGP for Outlook Alpha 13 Int.
Comment: Jeroen Massar / jeroen at unfix.org / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/

iQA/AwUBP1m9dCmqKFIzPnwjEQIi9ACcCwDWE8q37sVknGKx+HLbploQnw4An2bk
V2aGclP12SzfxOA/dJQewPPF
=xTjY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----