[dns-wg] v6 ns/glue naming bcp

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Koch <pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

    >> A and AAAA should use the same namespace.

    Peter> apart from this more general statement, which I agree with,
    Peter> separating namespaces would cost more precious octets in
    Peter> the packet.

I wonder if saving the odd octet here and there to squeeze stuff into
a 512 byte payload is really the best approach. It is wise to apply
the constraints of 1980's DNS to the world of IPv6 in the 21st
century? This seems to be storing up trouble for the future and could
make it awkward to get reasonable amounts of IPv6 glue deployed. How
feasible would it be to mandate or recommend that IPv6-aware DNS
clients use EDNS0 to get bigger payloads and complete glue RRsets?
Could we just say "use EDNS0" and be done with it?