This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[dns-wg] v6 ns/glue naming bcp

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Agenda for RIPE 46 (4th and final version)
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] v6 ns/glue naming bcp

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jakob Schlyter jakob at rfc.se
Fri Sep 5 10:12:05 CEST 2003

is there any operational considerations before putting both A and AAAA 
records on a name used glue?
or, should one use separate names for v4 and v6 transport?

e.g.:

	example.com.			NS    ns1.example.com.
						NS    ns2.example.com.
	ns1.example.com.		A	 192.0.2.1
						AAAA	 dead:beef::1
	ns2.example.com.		A	 192.0.2.2
						AAAA  dead:beef::2
vs
	example.com.			NS    ns1.example.com.
						NS    ns1.ipv6.example.com.
						NS    ns2.example.com.
						NS    ns2.ipv6.example.com.
	ns1.example.com.		A	 192.0.2.1
	ns1.ipv6.example.com.	AAAA	 dead:beef::1
	ns2.example.com.		A	 192.0.2.2
	ns2.ipv6.example.com.	AAAA	 dead:beef::2


yours,

	jakob

Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Agenda for RIPE 46 (4th and final version)
Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] v6 ns/glue naming bcp

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]