This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brad Knowles
brad.knowles at skynet.be
Thu May 22 20:34:13 CEST 2003
At 4:59 PM +0200 2003/05/22, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: >> At the very least, a more coordinated and public "name and shame" >> campaign might possibly do some good. > > Be careful with "name and shame" policies. People might start asking > why an organisation they are giving money to (particularly if they > have only one choice for that organisation) would go about "naming > and shaming" them. Sorry, when I said "name and shame", I meant from the perspective of an independent third party. Something along these lines is already done today, but I believe that these efforts could be increased and improved on. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles at skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]