[dns-wg] Progress with DNS Quality, Also: Lameness

On torsdag, maj 22, 2003, at 10:02 Europe/Stockholm, Daniel Karrenberg 
wrote:

> Nothing changes really despite a lot of effort put in and
> a lot of improvement in the (self)policing tools.

To be honest, the result I have shows for .SE:

  - Overall "errors" is 22.5%
  - Errors "large" DNS operators have is approximately 1%
  - "Large" DNS operators are asking me many questions because
    they think 1% is too bad (they have pushed it down from 1.1% to 0.6%

So, my conclusion is that one can not look at the overall average 
because I don't think that matters so much. Many domains being lame and 
bad (in the forward zones) might be domain names only "registered" by 
people wanting the domain name, but they are not "in use".

For in-addr.arpa, I don't know if one can draw the same or similar 
conclusions. It might be more the ISP interest of running in-addr.arpa 
in the first place which matters.

      paf