[dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at gitoyen.net
Thu May 15 09:34:27 CEST 2003
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:24:44PM +0200, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey at jefsey.com> wrote a message of 64 lines which said: > BPs should say that restrictions are to be documented both > in plain text and decribing case per case the tested reasons > of a denial so one can document when the testing is wrong. They are. Any one can see it by itself at http://zonecheck.nic.fr/v2/. > BPs should also say that the intended registration should > be valid when the denial of registration is due to its wrong > analysis of the registrant configuration. There is no reason > why the first come first served rule would defeated by an > error of the Registry. It is not (the ticket is not closed immediately when there is a configuration error). > BPs could say that the registry should provide its proposed > DNS configuration, so the Registrant could implement it to > get registered. For which software? BIND8, BIND9, nsd, PowerDNS? > Will you address IDNA? Yes.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]