[dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Tue May 13 12:00:09 CEST 2003
On måndag, maj 5, 2003, at 21:55 Europe/Stockholm, Brad Knowles wrote: > Specifically, I was thinking about a distributed collection script > and a centralized checking facility, where results could be posted to > the appropriate mailing lists and newsgroups, in much the same way as > the reports made by Rob Thomas to the NANOG mailing list (especially > his "lame delegation" report at <http://www.cymru.com/DNS/lame.html>). At the meeting in Barcelona I will describe my findings with my tool (http://dnscheck.paf.se/) which uses the dns verification script which runs on http://paf.se/domain/. You can also download the script (perl) and use yourself, under a BSD like license. I am sorry for being so late with the statistics collections I am now finally ready with, after working on this for 4 years or so... Anyway, the meta-questions I have found need some sort of answers are: - What is a proper set of requirements a registry set on operations of a child zone? (One can argue the registry should not care, BUT, in reality they do. The answer can be "do not care", but then it should be said very loud.) - What is a proper set of requirements one can set on a DNS operator, i.e. one which run DNS for a zone, a hosting service? Yes, they can differ, and should differ as for example tld for "se" should have different requirements than the local butcher shop (maybe). I at least see this list of "proper dns" is different from the _requirements_ a registry set. - Is the requirements different between in-addr.arpa delegations from the normal {cc,g}TLD delegations? If so, why? Note, I am really trying hard to only talk about technical things. No policy issues. Yes, a policy is that some technical hoops need to be passed, but, the technical requirements themselves is what I want to discuss. More at the DNS meeting. paf
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Delegation checking policy/procedure at ARIN
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]