[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] IPv6 reverse DNS meeting at last IETF

On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:50:03PM -0800, David Kessens wrote:
> 
> - 6to4 reverse delegation
>   
>   We discussed this topic briefly as a lesser priority item.
>   
>   As 6to4 is a transition mechanism for networks that can not get
>   native access to v6, we concluded that reverse delegation might not
>   be that important for the 6to4 addresses.
> 
>   This is clearly a point for more discussion for the DNS wg.

On the other hand, is there a reason why it should not be given (other 
than to "encourage" sites using 6to4 to move to native connectivity asap)?

I think the lack of public relays is currently keeping the usage of 6to4
relatively low, so the overhead in delegations would probably not be that
big.  Obviously once you commit to doing it, it's hard to remove the
service later :)

Tim