[dns-wg] Agenda DNS wg at RIPE 46

This is the first suggested agenda. Note that this include:

  - A skeleton built from the proposed charter of the wg, which
    you might not agree with. If the charter change, of course
    also the agenda is to be changed.
  - Bullets which doesn't have any speakers (yet). I want *YOU*
    to agree on saying something. Or, even better, nominate your
    friend/enemy instead of taking up the glove yourself!!! :-)
  - No time for each agenda item yet. It is unclear how to divide the
    three 90 minute slots we have between all DN* groups which we
    might merge

Agenda at RIPE 46
-----------------

[0] Charter / Agenda Bashing / Goals etc

Leader of the discussion: Patrik Fältström
Help from co-chairs: Jim Reid, Peter Koch and Jaap Akkerhuis.

0.1 Agenda
0.2 Charter
0.3 What are we doing here anyway?

[1] Topics with deliverables

1.1 Quality of the DNS

Leader of the discussion: Unknown


[2] Reports / status items (same bullets every meeting) (max 5 min each)

  2.1 Monitoring
   2.1.1 RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring
         Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>

  2.2 DNS in the IETF
   2.2.1 DNSEXT
         Unknown
   2.2.2 DNSOP
         Unknown
   2.2.3 Other wg's which touch DNS
         Unknown

  2.3 EPP deployment / experience / status
      Edward Lewis <edlewis at arin.net>
      Suggested reading:
         http://www.read of 
ipe.net/ripe/mail-archives/dns-wg/2003/msg00122.html

  2.4 Root servers
      Unknown

  2.5 IDN deployment / experience
      Unknown

  2.6 DNSSEC deployment / experience
      Unknown

  2.7 Anycast deployment / experience
      2.7.1 Dave Knight

  2.7 CENTR Technical committee
      Unknown

  2.8 DNS Software
    2.8.1 Bind
          Unknown
    2.8.2 OpenReg
          Unknown

  2.9 IPv6 deployment / experience
      Unknown



[3] Special invited (longer) presentation (30 min)

3.1 RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring
     Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>



[4] Temporary items (15 min each)

4.1 Use of DNS for SPAM prevention
     Note: This is not to be a spam discussion, but more a
           heads-up on the various mechanisms which exists
           and are discussed for example in the anti-spam
           research group in the IETF.
     Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell at habeas.com>