This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/dns-wg@ripe.net/
[dns-wg] Proposal: Charter for DN* wg at RIPE
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Looking for a tool to find the fastest DNS server
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Proposal: Charter for DN* wg at RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at cisco.com
Wed Aug 13 15:27:44 CEST 2003
Note: I want _LOTS_ of comments on the following. You will see after
this a message about the agenda of the meeting at RIPE 46.
Idea: Create a list of "topics" which are divided in two groups:
[1] Topics which are larger discussion items. Each one
will have one or more deliverables. There is a small
group of people responsible for deliverables and they
report back every DN* meeting.
[2] Organisations and groups (inside and outside of RIPE
and RIPE NCC) which report to the DNS wg what is happening,
what is currently discussed etc. This is summarized at
every RIPE meeting as a compiled report to the RIPE DNS
wg participants so they know what is happening in the world
The agenda at the RIPE meeting then consists of these two PLUS two
other categories:
[3] Invited longer talks
[4] Short reports from groups which do not come back every meeting
The result from [3] and [4] is only included in the minutes of the RIPE
meeting. Nothing more, nothing less.
Is that ok?
Given this is ok, the question is then what to include under each one
of the bullets. This is (as you will see on the proposed agenda) what I
want to have discussed at the RIPE meeting.
Below you can see _MY_PERSONAL_ idea. Probably many things forgotten,
possibly many things wrong.
Please correct. Let me know you are interested in spending some CPU
cycles.
Small things which will make the future more organized is that my goal
is to keep exactly the same "item numbers" for every item, and never
changing them over the years. That means the only topic I have got
suggestions on (see below) is 1.1. Next will be 1.2. Etc.
paf
Charter for the DN* wg at RIPE (to be updated at each RIPE meeting)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Topics with deliverables
1.1 Quality of the DNS
We have a few contributors here:
+ domainSentinel tool for lame checking
Chagres Role Account <role at chagres.net>
+ RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring
Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
+ DNSCHECK for verification of delegations
Patrik Fältström <paf at cisco.com>
Deliverables:
1.1.1 Recommendations for measures DNS serv*ice* quality
1.1.2 Recommendations how to summarise the results for consumption by
the non-technical public
1.1.3 What is an "error"?
1.1.3.1 "Lame"
1.1.3.2 "Wrong glue"
1.1.3.3 "Non-authoritative response"
1.1.3.4 "Transport over TCP"
1.1.3.5 ...
1.1.4 What is good practice regarding measurement?
1.1.5 ...
[2] Reports / status items
2.1 Monitoring
2.1.1 RIPE NCC DNS Monitoring
Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
2.2 DNS in the IETF
2.2.1 DNSEXT
2.2.2 DNSOP
2.2.3 Other wg's which touch DNS
2.3 EPP deployment / experience / status
Edward Lewis <edlewis at arin.net>
2.4 Root servers
2.5 IDN deployment / experience
2.6 DNSSEC deployment / experience
2.7 Anycast deployment / experience
2.7.1 Dave Knight
2.7.2 I-Root (Lars-Johan Liman)
2.7 CENTR Technical committee
2.8 DNS Software
2.8.1 Bind
2.8.2 OpenReg
2.8.3 ...
2.9 IPv6 deployment / experience
Unknown
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Looking for a tool to find the fastest DNS server
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Proposal: Charter for DN* wg at RIPE
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]