New draft charter for the RIPE DNS WG
Rodney Thayer rodney at declarator.net
Fri Jul 12 16:10:50 CEST 2002
At 09:45 AM 7/12/02 +0200, pk at TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: >Brad Knowles wrote: > > > Distribution of RIPE-area TLDs across a robust set of servers > > that are geographically diverse, and making this a "Best Current > > Practice" advocated by the WG, and then taking the next step and > > making this an actual RIPE requirement (and something that RIPE NCC > >what do you mean by "RIPE requirement" in this context? There are technical details about operating the infrastructure that might merit further codification. For example, who do you contact if a tld "disappears"? what ripe object do you look up? my point is, perhaps the technical part of this (e.g. making sure there is a ripe object, and a spec on how to use them) is a proper WG topic.
[ dns-wg Archives ]