DNS recommendations - the paper
- Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
- Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at ISI.EDU
bmanning at ISI.EDU
Wed Nov 25 00:18:01 CET 1998
> > >>> @ IN SOA ns.isp.net. netmaster.isp.net. > >>> ( 1998100100 86400 3600 604800 345600 ) > >> s/netmaster/hostmaster/ see RFC 2142 > >> or, i think it was piet who recommended being conservative, and do not > >> relying on aliases, rather use a real mailbox name. > > So that person can safely go on a two-week holiday? > > I'd rather put in a real hostname and not rely on MX records > > not discussing MX RRs. mailbox names. the reason i mention piet's > recommendation is twofold, i think he used to chair this group, and he > wrote one of those silly rfc things. though checking 1537, this point > seems not to have made the final cut. piet, you still around? RFC 1537 was obsoleted by RFC 1912 --bill
- Previous message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
- Next message (by thread): DNS recommendations - the paper
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]