This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP

• Previous message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
• Next message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bill Manning bmanning at ISI.EDU
Thu Apr 23 15:00:59 CEST 1998

There is also the e164 RR type already defined for use within the
DNS.  One can enter a "regular" e164 address (what we think of as
phone numbers) and have it map to an IP address.  Once this occurs,
it is my understanding that the call can be injected into the PSTN
from any location and be handled properly. (since the call has the
fully qualified telephone number)


-- 
--bill

• Previous message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP
• Next message (by thread): VoIP Numbering Plan Vs. Domain names. IPNP

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ dns-wg Archives ]