2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geert Jan de Groot
GeertJan.deGroot at ripe.net
Fri Jan 24 12:33:08 CET 1997
On Fri, 24 Jan 1997 01:49:32 -0800 (PST) Bill Manning wrote: > I would note that if there is a specific prefix and AS, then > the router to support such an attachment need not be very large. > This model is currently used for route servers and therouter > does not have to carry full routing. I don't think that is correct. It is likely that the router for the root-server (glad I don't need to pronounce that ;-) will get transit from multiple parties and need to do full routing as I don't think it is politically correct to default to someone. A route-server doesn't neccessary need to have full connectivity, and if it has, that connectivity doesn't have to be correctly spread among the people using it. That wouldn't be true for a root-server, would it? Geert Jan
- Previous message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): 2nd Root Server in Europe (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ dns-wg Archives ]