do we need a meeting of the DNS TF ?
Andreas.Knocke at nic.de Andreas.Knocke at nic.de
Mon Jan 16 19:17:50 CET 1995
> Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont at inria.fr> writes > * I can't see important problems which could make > * a meeting of the DNS TF necessary but perhaps > * I've forgotten something ? > * > * Thanks > * Francis.Dupont at inria.fr > > Question is whether we want to overhaul the domain object, or just > approve the small changes discussed last week. If we just want the > small changes, I am sure we can do it in the db-wg (Wilfried?). If we > want other bigger changes, we'd probably need a dns-wg meeting. We probably should still do it - if possible - within the db-wg. It's (just :-) another object and I think we should decide what's it use and what's the future of each of its attributes. I think it more relates to documented procedures and common usage of the RIPE DB than to DNS. It also has relevance with two action items in the db-wg (documentation, another new domain-object for in-addr delegations). But maybe I'm lacking the history of the dns-wg and db-wg than please excuse my ignorance. > -Marten Andreas (Knocke, DE-NIC)
[ dns-wg Archives ]