[dns-resolver-tf] Final final draft of RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practices
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-resolver-tf] Default max-ttl (was: Final final draft of RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practices)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-resolver-tf] RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maarten Aertsen
maarten at nlnetlabs.nl
Mon Mar 25 11:06:15 CET 2024
hi Shane, On Sun Mar 24, 2024 at 17:25 CET, Shane Kerr wrote: > Thank you for your suggestions, edits, and discussion. I've updated > the final draft to give us a final, final draft. 😉 > > I've included the last (?) version at the bottom of this e-mail, and > responded to your suggestions inline below. Thanks, including for your perseverance when Spamhaus ate your homework ;-) Only one comment; in regards to this change: > 2. its framework on a Recursive operator Privacy Statement, by > publishing a privacy statement on their website covers all topics in > Section 6. (See for example > [Cloudflare's > statement](https://developers.cloudflare.com/1.1.1.1/privacy/public-dns-resolver) > or [Quad9's privacy page](https://www.quad9.net/service/privacy/).) By citing examples in this context, a reader may infer that they meet this recommendation (ie. cover all topics in Section 6), which may or may not be true now and in the future. Checking now: Quad9's current privacy policy explicitly states it intends to meet or exceed the RFC, which makes it a good example at present. Cloudflare's does not. kind regards, Maarten
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-resolver-tf] Default max-ttl (was: Final final draft of RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practices)
- Next message (by thread): [dns-resolver-tf] RIPE DNS Resolver Best Common Practices
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]