[diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Keith Mitchell
keith at smoti.org
Tue Aug 6 17:11:13 CEST 2019
The function is very different, but the concept of a neutral, stable, respected panel of volunteers serving the community's interests is not so different from the existing arrangements for the RIPE NCC Arbiters' panel. It might be worth a look at the relevant documents in case there's anything in there that could be incorporated to save effort defining processes/structure, to make the CoC Team parameters more "RIPE-like", and/or that might otherwise be overlooked. Keith On 8/5/19 8:15 AM, Amanda Gowland wrote: > Please find attached a draft proposal for the CoC Team: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yqOUPR02SONuSt812cuOBkk_xnhjYzjdk9qmsJkcDdQ/edit?usp=sharing > > I used Sasha's draft as the framework for the doc, just > adding/editing where necessary. > > There are some to-be-determined factors, mainly: > > - How long should a term be for volunteers?> - How many people (minimum, maximum) should we aim for?> - What is the time-frame for response (e.g. how long would a reporter need to wait for a > confirmation of receipt from the team?) > > Please add your comments. > > Kind regards, > > Amanda
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] *draft* CoC Team doc
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]