[diversity] [Ext] Draft CoC and response guide

Thu Apr 11 11:45:24 CEST 2019

In principle, yes...but it's a grey area in terms of the RIPE Chair's 
scope...technically, SEE and ENOG and MENOG are not governed by RIPE.

I think once we have the RIPE CoC up and running, we can then push the 
respective PCs to adopt or amend to their needs while keeping the 
spirit/key points as close to ours as possible.

On 10/04/2019 14:59, Brian Nisbet wrote:
> First off, Sasha, this is great, thank you so much!
>
> Secondly, I think any CoC has to apply to all RIPE Community events 
> and online interactions. I don't think restricting it to just RIPE 
> meetings would be a good idea.
>
> Now, maybe there has to be something iterative here, but certainly the 
> aim should be to have the same, or as close to the same, bearing in 
> mind the diversity of the service region, CoC across anything RIPE is 
> running.
>
> Even if we started with the main meeting and the mailing lists, that 
> would be a good thing, but I'd really like to see it spread further 
> than that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Nisbet
>
> Service Operations Manager
>
> HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research Network
>
> 1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7, Ireland
>
> +35316609040 brian.nisbet at heanet.ie www.heanet.ie
>
> Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* diversity <diversity-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of Amanda 
> Gowland <agowland at ripe.net>
> *Sent:* Tuesday 9 April 2019 09:36
> *To:* diversity at ripe.net
> *Subject:* Re: [diversity] [Ext] Draft CoC and response guide
> Hi Gergana, Benno,
>
> Benno has it right.
>
> We talked about this in the last TF meeting - the minutes were
> circulated a few weeks ago or so. If we follow the typical TF protocol
> for work output, it's basically:
>
> - Present to the community
> - Ask for feedback from community
> - TF reiterates if needed
> - RIPE Chair declares consensus
>
> But since there isn't the equivalent of HPH in the other regional
> communities, I would imagine this would fall to the respective
> PCs...well, I'm not sure but I think that sounds right?
>
> thx,
>
> Amanda
>
> On 08/04/2019 18:20, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> > Hi Gergana and all,
> >
> > I think you are correct.
> >
> > Speaking now for myself, not the PC collective, a suggestion might 
> be to ask the RIPE chair, PC and the WG chairs collective for a first 
> reading and approval (not sure this is the right wording), and next 
> for community consensus of the CoC on the RIPE mailing list (not the 
> TF mailing list).
> >
> > But for sure, our RIPE chair knows how to proceed in the proper way.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > — Benno
> >
> > —
> > Benno J. Overeinder
> > NLnet Labs
> > https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
> >
> >> Op 8 apr. 2019 om 17:18 heeft Gergana Petrova <gpetrova at ripe.net> 
> het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >> Thanks Amanda! I can certainly bring this up with the relevant PCs 
> for the regional meetings.
> >>
> >> But, just for my info - is the RIPE PC going to be approving the 
> CoC? I wasn't aware they have to. They are responsible for the plenary 
> program, but not the meeting itself. So for example all day Wednesday 
> and Thursday have nothing to do with them. Here is their Charter for 
> more info: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-600 
> <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-600>).
> >>
> >> I thought the CoC is more a question of the RIPE community's 
> agreement/concensus (basically this taskforce's mailing list, which 
> include the people from the RIPE Community interested on this topic). 
> Similar to the way WGs work.
> >>
> >> Anybody from RIPE PC can shed light on this? Brian? I hope I'm not 
> creating a mess.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Gergana
> >>
> >>> On 08/04/2019 16:35, Amanda Gowland wrote:
> >>> Hi Gergana,
> >>> It's a good question. But seeing as the ENOG and MENOG and SEE 
> Meetings have their own PCs, I think it's probably something that they 
> would need to adopt on their own accord. Certainly, it would be simple 
> to just adapt one for the RIPE Meeting but it's not within the scope 
> of the TF to do that.
> >>> thx,
> >>> Amanda
> >>>> On 08/04/2019 16:30, Gergana Petrova wrote:
> >>>> Hi Sasha, hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just want to join in with thanking you for this excellent CoC draft!
> >>>>
> >>>> Just a general question, as I am not sure if the mandate of the 
> Transforce covers this. The CoC mentions "Where does the Code of 
> Conduct apply?" - RIPE meetings. I was wondering if we can include 
> "RIPE meetings and other events organised by the RIPE NCC such as 
> ENOG, MENOG, SEE and other regional meetings."
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Gergana
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 08/04/2019 10:48, Amanda Gowland wrote:
> >>>>> Sasha,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> THANK YOU for contributing such a stellar draft! I've gone 
> through and made some edits, some more British spelling-isms + putting 
> some of the goals in active tense. I also made the scope (in terms of 
> who it applies to) a bit more explicit.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Warm regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Amanda
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 08/04/2019 10:36, John Springer wrote:
> >>>>>> I agree, excellent work!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have suggest some minor edits of the Response guide.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> John Springer
> >>>>>> acting solely on my own behalf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 5:10 AM David Huberman 
> <david.huberman at icann.org <mailto:david.huberman at icann.org>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      Sasha,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      The draft CoC is quite excellent. Nice work!  I have 
> completed a
> >>>>>>      copyediting pass in "suggesting" mode:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      - normalized words to British English spellings (3 
> instances of
> >>>>>>      behavior were changed to behaviour)
> >>>>>>      - removed contractions
> >>>>>>      - fixed a few typos
> >>>>>>      - enforced consistent paragraph spacing
> >>>>>>      - enforced the Oxford comma
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      /david
> >>>>>>      writing solely on his personal behalf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      On 4/5/19, 7:32 AM, "diversity on behalf of Sasha Romijn"
> >>>>>> <diversity-bounces at ripe.net <mailto:diversity-bounces at ripe.net> on
> >>>>>>      behalf of sasha at mxsasha.eu <mailto:sasha at mxsasha.eu>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          Hello all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          Closely based on the work I did for Write the Docs, 
> with some
> >>>>>>      adjustments to fit the RIPE community, I put together a 
> draft for
> >>>>>>      a CoC and for a response guide.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          CoC:
> >>>>>> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1IAJj9UjW2zroz5v6XQYgYEYotfZlV4Trk2vRdaoPaP4_edit&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=sy8t_T8v902B5ESqiOxzVnu6ezEWJaYUIsfScYJuvyY&e=
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          Response guide:
> >>>>>> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1gaLo4axYDRTpQnhUJyG92EHBmEIkxSDN8Urmy-2Dzn9nQ_edit&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=tLYhKXwOC4CmhGYH2JhF4h-Qy6XZgbV4ujIJt5XPyus&e=
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          I went with Google docs for now, as it’s quite 
> accessible. You
> >>>>>>      can leave comments and suggest changes, and we can discuss 
> broader
> >>>>>>      topics on the mailing list. There are a few parts about 
> structure
> >>>>>>      still to be filled in, but let’s start here.
> >>>>>>          We haven’t really spoken about any of the details, 
> other than
> >>>>>>      a general “this can be a starting point”, so I don’t know what
> >>>>>>      kind of discussions other people would like to bring up.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          Sasha
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>          diversity mailing list
> >>>>>>      diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net>
> >>>>>> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.ripe.net_mailman_listinfo_diversity&d=DwIGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=iTOW7nSt3tBCc5xNiHfQNhFilU9Ki9_nVAHGfa3QG5w&m=ag_h5GXVGbSsDgGW59YleMXVaOJnV4ga6CJcCIfZ38A&s=BARWpiMNfao6C_dqEoTNumUx0AVYtnpFY2CTnE4YmwA&e=
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>      diversity mailing list
> >>>>>>      diversity at ripe.net <mailto:diversity at ripe.net>
> >>>>>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> diversity mailing list
> >>>>>> diversity at ripe.net
> >>>>>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> diversity mailing list
> >>>>> diversity at ripe.net
> >>>>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> diversity mailing list
> >>>> diversity at ripe.net
> >>>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> diversity mailing list
> >> diversity at ripe.net
> >> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > diversity mailing list
> > diversity at ripe.net
> > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> diversity mailing list
> diversity at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/diversity/attachments/20190411/5874f2b6/attachment.html>