[diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Malcolm Hutty
malcolm at linx.net
Mon Jul 17 11:28:22 CEST 2017
On 17/07/2017 09:19, Brian Nisbet wrote: > Malcolm, > > The CoC was suggested, then formally proposed, discussed by a small > group within the community, watered down, agreed to by the WG Chairs and > then announced. What you appear to be describing is a process in which some people came up with it (you?), and WG chairs had input into the drafting but nobody else. That's not a community process. Or was the wording proposed on ripe-list or in plenary for discussion before it went to the WG Chairs? If so, I missed it - which is quite possible, I must admit. > This TF hasn't been tasked with looking at the CoC but it is core to > what we're doing. OK then. -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
- Previous message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
- Next message (by thread): [diversity] Experiences from the Django community
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]