[db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Wed Nov 23 00:30:19 CET 2022
On 22 Nov 2022, at 19:11, Nick Hilliard via db-wg wrote: > Careful with this, e.g. AS-NULL. There are some situations where > referencing an empty set can be useful in RPSL. I'm not sure whether Nick meant this as a single exception, or rather as an example of a category of useful empty sets. I can well imagine that most "operationally empty objects" (as Denis put it) are either useless or troublesome. As Nick says, "Careful with this." Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]