[db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Sun Nov 20 18:52:12 CET 2022
Job Snijders via db-wg wrote on 20/11/2022 13:07: > I'd argue that the rules for what constitute valid hierarchical names > should not be changed; so the second component of the name doesn't need > to start with 'AS-'. you mean "does need to start with 'AS-'"? I don't see how rfc2622 allows naked terms, or how that would allow rpsl consumers to determine what type of set a specific named item was. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal: disallow creation of new non-hierarchically named AS-SET objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]